For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
November 30, 2006
Text of a Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate
November 30, 2006
Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)
I am transmitting an alternative plan for locality pay increases payable
to civilian Federal employees covered by the General Schedule (GS) and
certain other pay systems in January 2007.
Under title 5, United States Code, civilian Federal employees covered by
the GS and certain other pay systems would receive a two-part pay
increase in January 2007: (1) a 1.7 percent across-the-board adjustment
in scheduled rates of basic pay derived from Employment Cost Index data
on changes in the wages and salaries of private industry workers, and
(2) a 6.9 percent locality pay adjustment based on Bureau of Labor
Statistics' salary surveys of non-Federal employers in each locality pay
area. According to the statutory formula, for Federal employees covered
by the locality pay system, the overall average pay increase would be
about 8.6 percent. The total Federal employee pay increase would cost
about $8.8 billion in fiscal year 2007 alone.
Title 5, United States Code, authorizes me to implement an alternative
locality pay plan if I view the adjustment that would otherwise take
effect as inappropriate due to "national emergency or serious economic
conditions affecting the general welfare." For the reasons described
below, I have determined that it would be appropriate to exercise my
statutory alternative plan authority to set an alternative January 2007
locality pay increase.
A national emergency, within the meaning of chapter 53 of title 5, has
existed since September 11, 2001, that includes Operation Enduring
Freedom in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom. The growth in
Federal requirements is straining the Federal budget. Full statutory
civilian pay increases costing $8.8 billion in 2007 alone would
interfere with our Nation's ability to pursue the war on terrorism.
Such cost increases would threaten our efforts against terrorism or
force deep cuts in discretionary spending or Federal employment to stay
within budget. Neither outcome is acceptable. Therefore, I have
determined that a locality pay increase of 0.5 percent would be
appropriate for GS and certain other employees in January 2007. Our
national situation precludes granting larger locality pay increases at
this time.
Accordingly, I have determined that under the authority of section 5304a
of title 5, United States Code, locality-based comparability payments
for the locality pay areas in amounts set forth in the attached table
shall become effective on the first day of the first applicable pay
period beginning on or after January 1, 2007. When compared with the
payments currently in effect, these comparability payments will increase
the General Schedule payroll by 0.5 percent.
Finally, the law requires that I include in this report an assessment of
the impact of my decision on the Government's ability to recruit and
retain well-qualified employees. I do not believe this decision will
materially affect our ability to continue to attract and retain a
quality Federal workforce. To the contrary, since any pay raise above
what I have proposed would likely be unfunded, agencies would have to
absorb the additional cost and could have to freeze hiring in order to
pay the higher rates. Moreover, GS "quit" rates continue to be very low
(2.0 percent on an annual basis), well below the overall average "quit"
rate in private enterprise. Should the need arise, the Government has
many compensation tools, such as recruitment bonuses, retention
allowances, and special salary rates, to maintain the high quality
workforce that serves our Nation so very well.
Sincerely,
GEORGE W. BUSH
# # #
2007 Locality-Based Comparability Payments Under Alternative Plan
|
Locality Pay Area | Locality Payment |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL | 15.89% |
| Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH-ME-RI | 20.97 |
| Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY | 14.15 |
| Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI | 21.79 |
| Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN | 17.38 |
| Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH | 15.96 |
| Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH | 15.00 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth, TX | 17.34 |
| Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH | 14.27 |
| Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO | 20.02 |
| Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI | 21.53 |
| Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT-MA | 22.44 |
| Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX | 26.65 |
| Huntsville-Decatur, AL | 13.60 |
| Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN | 13.00 |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA | 24.03 |
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL | 18.30 |
| Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI | 15.54 |
| Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI | 18.17 |
| New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA | 24.57 |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 18.85 |
| Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ | 13.22 |
| Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA | 14.16 |
| Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA | 17.63 |
| Raleigh-Durham-Cary, NC | 16.18 |
| Richmond, VA | 14.41 |
| Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV | 18.99 |
| San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA | 20.34 |
| San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA | 30.33 |
| Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA | 18.58 |
| Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-PA-VA-WV | 18.59 |
| Rest of U.S. | 12.64 |
|
 |
|